McIntyre v. Kenvue, Inc. et al
Miesha McIntyre |
Kenvue, Inc. and McNeil Consumer Healthcare |
0:2023cv02862 |
September 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Patrick J Schiltz |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (Rusch, Jacob) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Miesha McIntyre (Rusch, Jacob) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Zackary S. Kaylor on behalf of Miesha McIntyre. (Kaylor, Zackary) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy J Becker on behalf of Miesha McIntyre. (Becker, Timothy) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kenvue, Inc., McNeil Consumer Healthcare. (ACH) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 23-cv-2862 PJS/JFD.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kenvue, Inc., McNeil Consumer Healthcare (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10539764) filed by Miesha McIntyre. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - FDA, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rusch, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.