Yusuf v. Blinken et al
| Ayan Ibrahim Yusuf |
| Antony Blinken and Consul General Robert P. Sanders |
| 0:2023cv02930 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Request. (Hoskins, Adam) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Antony Blinken, Robert P. Sanders. (Hoskins, Adam) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam J Hoskins on behalf of Antony Blinken, Robert P. Sanders. (Hoskins, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Robert P. Sanders. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 23-cv-2930 (DWF/DLM).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10552303) filed by Ayan Ibrahim YUSUF. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Interview Notice, #2 Exhibit(s) Visa Case Status, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Moua, Mai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
