Veritiv Operating Company v. Mutifeeder Technology, Inc.
| Multifeeder Technology, Inc. doing business as MFT Automation |
| Veritiv Operating Company |
| Multifeeder Technology, Inc. |
| 0:2023cv02936 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 2/8/2024. Fact Discovery due by 5/15/2024. Expert Discovery due by 8/5/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 2/8/2024. Motions (non-disp) due 5/15/2024. Motions (disp) due by 11/7/2024. Ready for trial due by 3/7/2025.The Court will schedule a settlement conference to take place in February or March 2024. Counsel are directed to meet and confer regarding potential dates for a settlement conference and then email Chambers regarding the same on or before November 20, 2023. A separate Order for Settlement Conference will be issued. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 11/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 E-Discovery Checklist, #2 Judge Foster's Practice Pointers)(LNP)
|
|
Filing 10
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE: At the parties' request (see ECF No. #9 ) and based on the Court's review of the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial scheduling conference scheduled for November 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM is CANCELED. The Court will issue a pretrial scheduling order based on the written submissions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 11/13/2023.(LNP)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Multifeeder Technology, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Veritiv Operating Company and Multifeeder Technology, Inc..(Cicero, Mary Cate) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Counterclaim filed by Veritiv Operating Company. (O'Neill, Pat) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report and Confidential Letters due by 11/9/2023. Pretrial Scheduling Conference set for 11/16/2023 at 09:00 AM by Zoom video (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 10/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(f) Report Template, #2 Consent Form)(LNP)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Veritiv Operating Company. filed by Multifeeder Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Proposal) (Cicero, Mary Cate) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Veritiv Operating Company. (O'Neill, Pat) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Veritiv Operating Company. Multifeeder Technology, Inc. served on 9/25/2023, answer due 10/16/2023. (O'Neill, Pat) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Multifeeder Technology, Inc. (ABR) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-2936 (PJS/DJF).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR) Modified text on 9/25/2023 (CLK). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mutifeeder Technology, Inc. d/b/a MFT Automation (filing fee $ 402, receipt number BMNDC-10552594) filed by Veritiv Operating Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (O'Neill, Pat) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
