Rivas Zavala v. Mayorkas et al
Walter Rivas Zavala |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Ur M. Jaddou |
0:2023cv02986 |
September 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Dulce J Foster |
Paul A Magnuson |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Walter Rivas Zavala (Ratkowski, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam J Hoskins on behalf of Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Hoskins, Adam) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Walter Rivas Zavala. Ur M. Jaddou served on 9/27/2023, answer due 11/27/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/27/2023, answer due 11/27/2023. (Ratkowski, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (ABR) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-2986 (PAM/DJF).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10560869) filed by Walter Rivas Zavala. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ratkowski, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.