U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
0:2023cv03030 |
September 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Douglas L Micko |
Eric C Tostrud |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly Jane Bunch on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Bunch, Kelly) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Delozano on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Delozano, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Union Pacific Railroad Company waiver sent on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023. (Heo, Won) |
Filing 8 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-NO SUMMONS REQUESTED. Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Company. (kt) Modified text on 10/11/2023 (MKB). |
Filing 7 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 23-cv-3030 ECT/DLM.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kt) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ethan Michael Morley Cohen on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Cohen, Ethan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann Henry on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Henry, Ann) |
Filing 4 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - NOTICE of Appearance by Ethan Michael Morley Cohen on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Cohen, Ethan) Modified text on 10/2/2023 (MMP). |
Filing 3 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR- WILL REFILE - NOTICE of Appearance by Ann Henry on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Henry, Ann) Modified text on 10/2/2023 (MMP). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Won Emma Heo on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Heo, Won) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Union Pacific Railroad Company filed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Heo, Won) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
Represented By: | Ann Henry |
Represented By: | Ethan Michael Morley Cohen |
Represented By: | Won Emma Heo |
Represented By: | Jonathan Delozano |
Represented By: | Kelly Jane Bunch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.