He v. Radel et al
| Ying He |
| David M. Radel, Director Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Jaddou and Merrick Garland |
| 0:2023cv03155 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 11/6/2023.(las)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ying He (Prokosch, Marc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory G Brooker on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Brooker, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (kt) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-3155 DWF/DJF.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David M. Radel (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10591990) filed by Ying He. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
