Boland v. Smith et al
John James Boland |
Jake Smith and Olga Voronchak |
0:2023cv03259 |
October 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David T Schultz |
Eric C Tostrud |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Olga Voronchak, Jake Smith. Olga Voronchak waiver sent on 11/4/2023, answer due 1/3/2024; Jake Smith waiver sent on 11/4/2023, answer due 1/3/2024. (Hruby, Vicki) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Vicki A Hruby on behalf of Jake Smith, Olga Voronchak. (Hruby, Vicki) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph E Flynn on behalf of Jake Smith, Olga Voronchak. (Flynn, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jake Smith, Olga Voronchak. (MMG) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 23-cv-3259 ECT/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10615370) filed by John Boland. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Applebaum, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.