United States of America v. $102,546.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| $102,546.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Robert E. Burton |
| 0:2023cv03275 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| John F Docherty |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig E Cascarano on behalf of Robert E. Burton. (Cascarano, Craig) Modified text on 12/4/2023 (ACH). |
| Filing 5 CLAIM Verified filed by $102,546.00 in U.S. Currency. (Cascarano, Craig) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM Returned Executed as to $102,546.00 in U.S. Currency. (CLK) Document QC'd on 11/21/2023 (DLO). |
| Filing 3 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM issued. (ABR) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 23-cv-3275 NEB/JFD.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture in Rem against $102,546.00 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Draisey, Lucas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
