Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
| Bill Lietzke |
| City of Montgomery, Chief Kevin Murphy, Steven Reed and Kevin Murphy |
| 0:2023cv03329 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Tony N Leung |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(ACH) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. These cases are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1406(a). The applications to proceed in forma pauperis of plaintiff Bill Lietzke #2 are DENIED. Lietzke may not initiate any new proceedings in this District unless he is represented by counsel or receives the advance permission of a judicial officer of this District. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 11/3/2023. (KMW)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Bill Lietzke. (JGK) Document QC'd on 11/28/2023 (ACH). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy, Steven Reed filed by Bill Lietzke. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (JGK) Document QC'd on 11/28/2023 (ACH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
