Fernandez et al v. Jaddou et al
| Gabriel Fernandez, Karen Juarez-Loza and D.Q.J. |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan and Trina M. Swanson |
| 0:2023cv03352 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by D.Q.J., Gabriel Fernandez, Karen Juarez-Loza (Devine, Mikaela) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam J Hoskins on behalf of All Defendants. (Hoskins, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Trina M. Swanson. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 23-cv-3352 KMM/TNL.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10633045) filed by Gabriel Fernandez, D.Q.J., Karen Juarez-Loza. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Devine, Mikaela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
