Garrison v. Minnesota Department of Revenue of the State of Minnesota et al
| Peter Garrison |
| Minnesota Department of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, Gina Armacher, Kennedy Gisemba, David Denault and Angela Smedlund |
| 0:2023cv03485 |
| November 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| David T Schultz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gina Armacher, David Denault, Kennedy Gisemba, Minnesota Department of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, Angela Smedlund. CC: Peter Garrison w/ Info Sheet #2 (jam) |
| Filing 2 FILLED IN ERROR, WILL REFILE: Summons Issued as to Gina Armacher, David Denault, Kennedy Gisemba, Paul Marquart, Minnesota Department of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, Angela Smedlund. CC: Peter Garrison w/ Info Sheet #2 (jam) Modified text on 11/15/2023 (jam). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gina Armacher, David Denault, Kennedy Gisemba, Paul Marquart, Minnesota Department of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, Angela Smedlund (filing fee $402, receipt number 4-3882) filed by Peter Garrison. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per 3rd, 4th - Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (jam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
