Martin v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
| Richard Martin |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company |
| 0:2023cv03552 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Jeffrey M Bryan |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Due to the appointment of Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan, this case is reassigned to him. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright is no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 23-cv-3552 JMB/DJF. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. . Note: any current hearings or conferences before the district judge in this case are canceled unless otherwise indicated by the new DJ courtroom deputy. (CLK) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Richard Martin. Aetna Life Insurance Company waiver sent on 12/6/2023, answer due 2/5/2024. (Schmoll, Zachary) |
Filing 6
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Gloria Chi-Ki Lam for Richard Martin. Approved by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 11/28/2023. (jam)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gloria C. Lam. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10678891 filed by Richard Martin. (Schmoll, Zachary) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RMM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Aetna Life Insurance Company. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-3552 WMW/DJF.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aetna Life Insurance Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10664989) filed by Richard Martin. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schmoll, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Martin | |
| Represented By: | Zachary Schmoll |
| Represented By: | Gloria Chi-Ki Lam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
