Nelson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
| Nickolas R Nelson |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 0:2023cv03630 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(BTX) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by The Hon. Susan Richard Nelson on 1/22/2024. (LLM)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Nickolas R Nelson. Jointly Signed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Smith, Catrina) |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR: REFILED STIPULATION of Dismissal with Equifax by Nickolas R Nelson. Jointly Signed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Smith, Catrina) Modified text on 1/22/2024 (kt). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement with Equifax by Nickolas R Nelson (Smith, Catrina) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, Response due by 12/18/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 12/4/2023. (TMA)
|
| Filing 5 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-3630 (SRN/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Equifax Information Services LLC.(Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10679329) filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nelson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nickolas R Nelson | |
| Represented By: | Catrina E Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
