Kelly v. Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, The et al
Stephen P. Kelly |
Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, The, Jill Phillips and Jane Doe |
0:2023cv03635 |
November 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Jerry W Blackwell |
Dulce J Foster |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Stephen P. Kelly. (LTT) Document QC'd on 1/22/2024 (ACH). |
Filing 5 SECONDARY MOTION to Direct Service of Process Under a Rule (4) Waiver, or an Order Directing Service of Process by the United States Marshals Office Upon a U.S.M. 285 Form filed by Stephen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LTT) Document QC'd on 1/22/2024 (ACH). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Direct Service of Process filed by Stephen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LTT). Document QC'd on 1/4/2024 (LTT). |
Filing 3 LETTER TO CLERK'S OFFICE from Stephen P. Kelly. (JGK) Document QC'd on 12/8/2023 (JME). |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Stephen P. Kelly. (JGK) Document QC'd on 12/8/2023 (JME). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, The, Jill Phillips filed by Stephen P. Kelly. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JGK) Document QC'd on 12/8/2023 (JME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.