Vang et al v. Jaddou et al
Josiah Neng Vang and Payia Payeveu |
Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Michelle Y. Outlaw and Anthony Blinken |
0:2023cv03779 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily M Peterson on behalf of Anthony Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Michelle Y. Outlaw. (Peterson, Emily) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Anthony Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Michelle Y. Outlaw. (MMG) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-3779 SRN/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10711651) filed by Josiah Neng Vang, Payia Payeveu. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) I-130 Approval Notice, #2 Exhibit(s) DS-260 Confirmation, #3 Exhibit(s) Interview Notice, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Moua, Mai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.