Aguila v. Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH et al
| Rafael Aguila |
| Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH and Philips North America, LLC |
| 0:2023cv03838 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Ann D Montgomery |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(ACH) |
Filing 13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 1/31/2024.(LPH)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rafael Aguila (Aguila, Rafael) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's Notice of APPLICATION FOR PRO SE LITIGANT TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. Rafael Aguila is GRANTED e-filing privileges in this case. Pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 5 and 7(d), Rafael Aguila has consented to electronic service and has agreed to waive service by other means for all subsequent filings in this case, except when electronic service is not allowed under the rules. (KMO) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Request for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to January 30, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 1/8/2024. (HAM)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Rafael Aguila. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(MMG) Document QC'd on 1/26/2024 (ABR). |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH, Philips North America, LLC.(Tanick, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH, Philips North America, LLC. (Tanick, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH, Philips North America, LLC. (Tanick, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Aguila. Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH served on 12/19/2023, answer due 1/9/2024. (MMP) Document QC'd text on 1/16/2024 (JME). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Aguila. Philips North America, LLC served on 12/19/2023, answer due 1/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMP) Document QC'd on 1/16/2024 (JME). |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT DUE TO CASE ASSIGNMENT ERROR. This case is reassigned to Judge Ann D. Montgomery and Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan, Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 23-cv-3838 ADM/TNL. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH, Philips North America, LLC. cc: Rafael Aguila w/ Info Sheet #2 (jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH, Philips North America, LLC (filing fee $405, receipt number 4-4231) filed by Rafael Aguila. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
