Putz v. Ryan Companies US, Inc.
| Janan Putz |
| Ryan Companies US, Inc. |
| 0:2023cv03871 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Jeffrey M Bryan |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
(Text-Only) Order: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), for good cause shown, to facilitate the parties' settlement discussions and promote judicial efficiency, the Court APPROVES the #9 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before February 26, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 1/23/2024. (JC)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 Stipulation. (McNee, Emily) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Second Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Ryan Companies US, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Janan Putz. (McNee, Emily) |
|
Filing 8
(Text-Only) Order: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and for good cause shown, the Court APPROVES the #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. Defendant shall file its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before January 26, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 1/8/2024. (JC)
|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Stipulation. (McNee, Emily) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Ryan Companies US, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Janan Putz. (McNee, Emily) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily A McNee on behalf of Ryan Companies US, Inc.. (McNee, Emily) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Janan Putz Summons, Complaint, and Civil Cover Sheet (Boyle, Amy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ryan Companies US, Inc. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-3871 (JMB/DJF).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ryan Companies US, Inc. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10733691) filed by Janan Putz. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Boyle, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Putz v. Ryan Companies US, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janan Putz | |
| Represented By: | Christopher J Moreland |
| Represented By: | Amy Elizabeth Boyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ryan Companies US, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Emily A McNee |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline E. Kalk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
