Hyper Ice, Inc. et al v. Bob and Brad, LLC
Hyper Ice, Inc. and HyperIce IP Subco, LLC |
Bob and Brad, LLC |
0:2024cv00011 |
January 3, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
David T Schultz |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Plaintiff's REPLY to Counterclaim filed by Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. (Firestone, Julie) |
Filing 16 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Bob and Brad, LLC. (Wang, Gary) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. filed by Bob and Brad, LLC. (Wang, Gary) |
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lawrence R. Laporte. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10795133 filed by Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. (Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. Bob and Brad, LLC served on 1/17/2024, answer due 2/7/2024. (Morgan, Richard) |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Benjamin A. Herbert. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10780080 filed by Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. (Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie H Firestone on behalf of Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. (Firestone, Julie) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gary F. Wang. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10767471 filed by Bob and Brad, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Non-Resident to Serve as Local Counsel affidavit of proposed admittee)(Qu, Delin) |
Filing 6 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Lawrence R. LaPorte, Ben Herbert as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MKB) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bob and Brad, LLC. (MKB) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Patent) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-11 (KMM/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Hyper Ice, Inc. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. (Morgan, Richard) Modified text on 1/4/2024 (MMG). |
Filing 2 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Bob and Brad, LLC (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10749382) filed by Hyper Ice, Inc., HyperIce IP Subco, LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Morgan, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.