Shipman v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. et al
| Dominique Shipman |
| Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. doing business as Ulta Beauty, Ulta Beauty, Inc. doing business as Ulta Beauty, City of Roseville and Officer Joe Cox |
| 0:2024cv00091 |
| January 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| John F Docherty |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER on #18 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 2/22/2024.(TJS)
|
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #15 Amended Complaint filed by City of Roseville, Joe Cox. (McEllistrem, Tessa) |
| Filing 19 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #18 Stipulation. (MacDonald, Erica) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Extend Ulta Defendants Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Ulta Beauty, Inc., Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Dominique Shipman. (MacDonald, Erica) |
| Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT of Motions Hearing held on 1/29/2024 before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (11 pages). Court Reporter: Renee Rogge. For a copy of the transcript, please file a Transcript Request under Other Filings/Other Documents.Parties have 21 days to file a Statement of Redaction. In accordance with Judicial Conference policy and #Local Rule 80.1, the transcript may be released and made remotely electronically available to the public in 90 days. For further information on redaction procedures, please review #Local Rule 5.5 and #Case Information >Transcripts, Court Reporters and Digital Audio Recordings. Statement of Redaction due 3/1/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/11/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/9/2024. (RAR) |
| Filing 16 EXPEDITED DAILY TRANSCRIPT SERVICES REQUEST to Court Reporter Renee Rogge. (Tawfic, Kacie) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. filed by Dominique Shipman. No summons requested. (Frank, Matthew) |
|
Filing 14
(Text-Only) MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 1/29/2024: Oral Arguments Motion Hearing.Court Reporter: Renee RoggeSt. Paul Courthouse, Courtroom Edward J. Devitt CourtroomTime: 10:00 - 10:13 amTotal Time: 13 min.APPEARANCES:For Plaintiff: Matthew FrankFor Defendant Ulta Beauty: John Ursu, Erica MacDonald For Defendants City of Roseville and Officer Cox: Tessa McEllistrem PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., Ulta Beauty, Inc. The motion was moved, argued, and granted. No written order will issue. Defendant Ulta Beauty, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before February 16, 2024. Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before February 16, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty.(ATB)
|
|
Filing 13
(Text-Only) ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Defendants Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer #6 . Briefing on the motion is now closed, and the Court will schedule this motion to be heard on Monday, January 29, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. in the Edward J. Devitt Courtroom on the first floor of the federal courthouse, 316 North Robert Street, Saint Paul. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 1/22/2024. (TJS)
|
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Matthew A. Frank in Opposition to #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Dominique Shipman.(Frank, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Dominique Shipman. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Frank, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint filed by City of Roseville, Joe Cox. (McEllistrem, Tessa) |
|
Filing 9
(Text-Only) ORDER in Response to #6 Motion for Extension: Defendants Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. have filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, which is opposed by Plaintiff. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2) the answer or other response is currently due on January 18, 2024. Under L.R. 7.1(b)(2) Plaintiff's response to the extension motion is due by January 19, 2024, the day after the due date for the answer. Since it is not possible for the Court to rule on the extension motion before the answer is due, the deadline for Defendants Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond is hereby stayed pending resolution of this motion. The Court will determine whether to hold a hearing on the motion once briefing is complete and will set a new due date for an answer once the extension motion is decided. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 1/16/2024. (TJS)
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Ulta Beauty, Inc., Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc..(MacDonald, Erica) |
| Filing 7 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Ulta Beauty, Inc., Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc..(MacDonald, Erica) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Ulta Beauty, Inc., Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.. (MacDonald, Erica) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mollie Buelow on behalf of City of Roseville, Joe Cox. (Buelow, Mollie) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tessa M McEllistrem on behalf of City of Roseville, Joe Cox. (McEllistrem, Tessa) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Jack Leon as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 24-cv-91 (NEB/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10769665) filed by Ulta Beauty, Inc. d/b/a Ulta Beauty, Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. d/b/a Ulta Beauty. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) B Consent to Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (MacDonald, Erica) Modified text on 1/12/2024 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
