Xtra Care Inc v. Birkshire Hathaway et al
| Xtra Care Inc |
| Birkshire Hathaway and NorGuard Insurance |
| 0:2024cv00120 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint filed by Birkshire Hathaway, NorGuard Insurance. (Krall, Tony) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Birkshire Hathaway, NorGuard Insurance re #4 Notice of Appearance Declaration of Mail Service on Plaintiff (Krall, Tony) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tony R Krall on behalf of Birkshire Hathaway, NorGuard Insurance. (Krall, Tony) |
Filing 3
ORDER/NOTICE TO PARTY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 1/18/2024.(CRK)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Birkshire Hathaway, NorGuard Insurance. CC: Xtra Care Inc w/ Info Sheet #2 (jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Birkshire Hathaway, NorGuard Insurance (filing fee $405, receipt number 4-4489) filed by Xtra Care Inc. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) Modified text on 1/17/2024 (jam). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
