Bounzuo v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Nchuo Shangha Muaikei Bounzuo |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Merrick B. Garland |
| 0:2024cv00138 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory G Brooker on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Brooker, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 24-cv-138 (PJS/DLM).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for writ of mandamus and APA against Merrick B. Garland, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10782441) filed by Nchuo Shangha Muaikei Bounzuo. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Miller, Maria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
