Africano et al v. Jaddou et al
| Enrique Amin Africano and Jue Wang |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan and Trina M. Swanson |
| 0:2024cv00168 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| John R Tunheim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Enrique Amin Africano, Jue Wang (Devine, Mikaela) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam J Hoskins on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Trina M. Swanson. (Hoskins, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Trina M. Swanson. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-168 (JRT/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10789857) filed by Enrique Amin Africano, Jue Wang. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Devine, Mikaela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
