Abdi et al v. Jaddou et al
| Ardo Moalin Abdi, Fadumo Mohamed Mahdo, Ridwan Mohamed Mahdi, Asia Mohamed Mahdi and Asho Mohamed Mahdi |
| Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Marc D. Dillard |
| 0:2024cv00200 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Jeffrey M Bryan |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor Brown on behalf of Marc D. Dillard, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Brown, Trevor) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Marc D. Dillard, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan per Civil (6th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 24-cv-200 JMB/LIB.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marc D. Dillard, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10797305) filed by Ridwan Mohamed Mahdi, Fadumo Mohamed Mahdo, Ardo Moalin Abdi, Asia Mohamed Mahdi, Asho Mohamed Mahdi. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
