Reid et al v. RealPage Utility Management, Inc. et al
| Eleshea Reid and Michael Matthews |
| RealPage Utility Management, Inc., Bader Management, Inc., YES Energy Management, Inc., Stephen Scott Management, Inc. and Cedar Pass South, LLC |
| 0:2024cv00368 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Jerry W Blackwell |
| John F Docherty |
| Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 REQUEST for An Enlargement of Word Limit by Bader Management, Inc., Cedar Pass South, LLC, Stephen Scott Management, Inc.. (Windler, Joseph) |
Filing 39
Text-Only ORDER denying without prejudice #31 Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Responses on Motions to Dismiss Until Completion of Jurisdictional Discovery. Plaintiffs' motion is premature. No motions to dismiss have been filed; no party has filed a motion for leave to take jurisdictional discovery; and no jurisdictional discovery has been authorized. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 4/4/2024. (ALM)
|
| Filing 38 NOTICE of Appearance by Devon Holstad on behalf of Bader Management, Inc., Cedar Pass South, LLC, Stephen Scott Management, Inc.. (Holstad, Devon) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph M Windler on behalf of Bader Management, Inc., Cedar Pass South, LLC, Stephen Scott Management, Inc.. (Windler, Joseph) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE of Appearance by Miriam Solomon on behalf of Bader Management, Inc., Cedar Pass South, LLC, Stephen Scott Management, Inc.. (Solomon, Miriam) |
|
Filing 35
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint, filed by YES Energy Management, Inc. The Court finds good cause for the requested 11-day extension of time to respond to the Complaint for two reasons: (1) to align YES's deadline with that of the other Defendants so that the Court is managing one schedule, not two; and (2) YES's counsel needs additional time to prepare a response. In addition, the Court finds that YES's counsel adequately met and conferred with Plaintiffs' counsel pursuant to D. Minn. LR 7.1(a). YES shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 4/9/24. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 4/4/2024. (ALM)
|
| Filing 34 EXHIBIT 1- 7 re #30 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Eleshea Reid.(Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 33 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, #31 Motion to Stay filed by Eleshea Reid.(Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 32 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, filed by Eleshea Reid.(Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 31 MOTION to Stay re #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, filed by Eleshea Reid. (Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 30 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, filed by Eleshea Reid. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Singh, Earl) |
|
Filing 29
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #28 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David M. Gettings for RealPage Utility Management, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 4/3/2024. (jam)
|
| Filing 28 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David M. Gettings. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10944860 filed by RealPage Utility Management, Inc.. (Gettings, David) |
| Filing 27 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for RealPage Utility Management, Inc.. (Morgan, Addison) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Addison Jelani Morgan on behalf of RealPage Utility Management, Inc.. (Morgan, Addison) |
|
Filing 25
(Text-Only) ORDER in Response to #19 Motion for Extension: Defendant YES Energy Management, Inc. has filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, which is opposed by Plaintiff. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the answer or other response is currently due on March 29, 2024 (Dkt. No. 12). Under L.R. 7.1(b)(2) Plaintiff's response to the motion is due by April 3, 2024, which is after the answer due date. Therefore, the deadline for Defendant YES Energy Management is hereby stayed pending resolution of this motion. The Court will determine whether to hold a hearing on the motion once briefing is complete. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 3/27/2024.(TJS)
|
| Filing 24 Declaration of James M. Ruley in Support of #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, filed by YES Energy Management, Inc..(Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 23 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Granting Defendant YES Energy Management, Inc's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #21 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #20 Notice of Hearing on Motion, #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, #22 Meet and Confer Statement. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 22 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by YES Energy Management, Inc..(Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Support re #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, filed by YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, : Date and time to be determined. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Order on Stipulation, #1 Complaint,, filed by YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 18 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Eleshea Reid Request date for Rule 26(f) conference. (Singh, Earl) |
|
Filing 17
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Abigail Howd for YES Energy Management, Inc.; granting #15 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Ryan Watstein for YES Energy Management, Inc.; granting #16 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney James Michael Ruley for YES Energy Management, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 3/6/2024. (KMO)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney James M. Ruley. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10885474 filed by YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ryan D. Watstein. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10885470 filed by YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Abigail Howd. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10885462 filed by YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 13 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER on #10 Stipulation. YES Energy Management, Inc. answer due 3/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 3/4/2024.(TJS)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation,. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION re #4 Summons Returned Executed, #1 Complaint,, Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant Yes Energy Management, Inc. to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint by YES Energy Management, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Eleshea Reid and Michael Matthews. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Ann Santos on behalf of YES Energy Management, Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Eleshea Reid. Bader Management, Inc. waiver sent on 2/9/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Eleshea Reid. Cedar Pass South, LLC waiver sent on 2/9/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Eleshea Reid. Stephen Scott Management, Inc. waiver sent on 2/9/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Eleshea Reid. RealPage Utility Management, Inc. waiver sent on 2/9/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. (Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eleshea Reid. YES Energy Management, Inc. served on 2/14/2024, answer due 3/6/2024. (Singh, Earl) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bader Management, Inc., Cedar Pass South, LLC, RealPage Utility Management, Inc., Stephen Scott Management, Inc., YES Energy Management, Inc. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 24-cv-368 (JWB/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10826691) filed by Eleshea Nicole Reid. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Civil Cover Sheet) (Singh, Earl) Modified text on 2/7/2024 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
