Johnson v. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. et al
Plaintiff: Brendan Johnson
Defendant: Gurstel Law Firm, P.C., Razor Capital, LLC and Razor Capital II, LLC
Case Number: 0:2024cv00449
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referring Judge: David T Schultz
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2024 Filing 21 NOTICE of Settlement by Brendan Johnson (Barry, Peter)
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 20 AMENDED ORDER on #18 Stipulation. Razor Capital II, LLC answer due 4/3/2024; Razor Capital, LLC answer due 4/3/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/22/2024. (TJB) Modified text on 3/25/2024 (kt).
March 20, 2024 Filing 19 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #18 Stipulation. (Newman, Patrick)
March 20, 2024 Filing 18 STIPULATION SECOND STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Razor Capital II, LLC, Razor Capital, LLC. Jointly Signed by Razor Capital, LLC, Razor Capital II, LLC, and Brendan Johnson. (Newman, Patrick)
March 19, 2024 Filing 17 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.. (Newman, Patrick)
March 13, 2024 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.. (Newman, Patrick)
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER on #12 Stipulation. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. answer due 3/13/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/8/2024. (TJB)
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AMENDED ORDER on #8 Stipulation. Razor Capital II, LLC answer due 3/20/2024; Razor Capital, LLC answer due 3/20/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/8/2024. (TJB)
March 7, 2024 Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re to Extend Time to Respond #12 Stipulation. (Barry, Peter)
March 7, 2024 Filing 12 STIPULATION re #5 Summons Returned Executed, #1 Complaint by Brendan Johnson. Jointly Signed by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.. (Barry, Peter)
March 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER on #8 Stipulation. Razor Capital II, LLC answer due 3/25/2024; Razor Capital, LLC answer due 3/25/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/7/2024. (TJB)
March 6, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. re #4 Waiver of Service Executed Notice to Withdraw Waiver of Service Executed (Goltz, Amy)
March 5, 2024 Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Newman, Patrick)
March 5, 2024 Filing 8 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer Complaint by Razor Capital II, LLC, Razor Capital, LLC. Jointly Signed by Razor Capital, LLC, Razor Capital II, LLC, and Brendan Johnson. (Newman, Patrick)
February 19, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brendan Johnson. Razor Capital, LLC served on 2/14/2024, answer due 3/6/2024. (Barry, Peter)
February 19, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brendan Johnson. Razor Capital II, LLC served on 2/15/2024, answer due 3/7/2024. (Barry, Peter)
February 15, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brendan Johnson. (Barry, Peter)
February 14, 2024 Filing 4 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR//WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. waiver sent on 2/14/2024, answer due 4/15/2024. (Goltz, Amy) Modified text on 3/6/2024 (ACH).
February 13, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gurstel Law Firm, P.C., Razor Capital II, LLC, Razor Capital, LLC. (MMG)
February 13, 2024 Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-449 NEB/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10840106) filed by Brendan Johnson. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Barry, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brendan Johnson
Represented By: Peter F Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.
Represented By: Amy M Goltz
Represented By: Patrick D Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Razor Capital, LLC
Represented By: Patrick D Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Razor Capital II, LLC
Represented By: Patrick D Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?