Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. Ram Buildings, Inc.
Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. |
Ram Buildings, Inc. |
0:2024cv00450 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Dulce J Foster |
Donovan W Frank |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 15 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Ram Buildings, Inc.. (O'Neil, Barry) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial filed by Ram Buildings, Inc.. (O'Neil, Barry) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Zellmer Heffernan on behalf of Ram Buildings, Inc.. (Heffernan, Nathan) |
|
Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation. (O'Neil, Barry) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer by Ram Buildings, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Grant Heilman Photography, Inc.. (O'Neil, Barry) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry A O'Neil on behalf of Ram Buildings, Inc.. (O'Neil, Barry) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Grant Heilman Photography, Inc.. Ram Buildings, Inc. served on 2/15/2024, answer due 3/7/2024. (Beckworth, Faith) |
|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ram Buildings, Inc. (CLK) |
Filing 5 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Copyright, Trademark) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 24-cv-450 DWF/DJF.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Faith Beckworth. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10840186 filed by Grant Heilman Photography, Inc.. (Hansen, Nathan) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Grant Heilman Photography, Inc.. (Hansen, Nathan) |
Filing 2 REPORT ON FILING OF COPYRIGHT ACTION (USCO noticed with filing.). (Hansen, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ram Buildings, Inc. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10840139) filed by Grant Heilman Photography, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hansen, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. Ram Buildings, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nathan M Hansen |
Represented By: | Faith Beckworth |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ram Buildings, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Barry A O'Neil |
Represented By: | Nathan Zellmer Heffernan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.