Mel Foster Company, Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Mel Foster Company, Inc. |
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
0:2024cv00503 |
February 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Susan Richard Nelson |
David T Schultz |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 25 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 5/14/2024 at 09:30 AM in Video Conference (no courtroom) before Judge Susan Richard Nelson. (Pierce, W.) |
Filing 24 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #23 Joint MOTION for Continuance of Hearing Pending Settlement filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..(Pierce, W.) |
Filing 23 Joint MOTION for Continuance of Hearing Pending Settlement filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Pierce, W.) |
Filing 22 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Mel Foster Company, Inc.. (Glazer, Adam) |
Filing 21 REPLY re #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Pierce, W.) |
Filing 20 **TEXT ONLY** NOTICE of Resetting of Hearing from In-Person to Video Conference re: #9 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION, and #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General : The Motion Hearing set for Tuesday, April 9, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., will no longer be In-Person but via Video Conference (Zoom) (no courtroom), before The Hon. Susan Richard Nelson. This is a change from In-Person to Video Conference ONLY. (LLM) |
![]() |
Filing 18 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Adam J. Glazer. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10924276 filed by Mel Foster Company, Inc.. (Obermueller, Michael) |
![]() |
Filing 16 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney W. Matthew Pierce. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10919915 filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney John D. Esterhay. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10919905 filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Mel Foster Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Exhibit(s) A Agreement, #3 Exhibit(s) B Demand Letter, #4 Exhibit(s) C Declaration of Michael Swenson)(Obermueller, Michael) |
Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..(Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 12 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #8 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..(Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 11 Declaration of W. Matthew Pierce in Support of #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3)(Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 4/9/2024 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 7B (STP) before Judge Susan Richard Nelson. (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 Order to Party File Document/Respond to Court filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of W. Matthew Pierce In Support)(Dufresne, Andrew) |
![]() |
Filing 5 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Adam J. Glazer, Kelly M. Cronin, John D. Esterhay, W. Matthew Pierce as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. cc: Adam J. Glazer,Kelly M. Cronin, John D. Esterhay, W. Matthew Pierce. (LTT) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per Civil 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-503 SRN/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (LTT) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Thomas Dufresne on behalf of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th Dist. Hennepin County, case number 27-CV-24-606 (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10849369) filed by Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) State Court Affidavit of Service and Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) State Court Case Docket, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dufresne, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.