Meyer v. John/Jane Doe et al
Scott Meyer |
John/Jane Doe and Merrick Garland |
0:2024cv00549 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Jeffrey M Bryan |
Tony N Leung |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of APPLICATION FOR PRO SE LITIGANT TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. Scott Howard Meyer is GRANTED e-filing privileges in this case. Pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 5 and 7(d), Scott Howard Meyer has consented to electronic service and has agreed to waive service by other means for all subsequent filings in this case, except when electronic service is not allowed under the rules. (KMO) |
Filing 4 LETTER to the Court from Scott Meyer. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(MMG) Document QCd on 3/26/2024 (MMG). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Scott Meyer (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMG) Document QCd on 3/26/2024 (MMG). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John/Jane Doe, Scott Meyer. cc: Scott Meyer w/ Info Sheet #2. (jam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, John/Jane Doe (filing fee $405, receipt number 4-4777) filed by Scott Meyer. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan per 3rd, 4th - Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) Document QC'd on 3/14/2024 (ACH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.