Janson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Barbara Janson |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 0:2024cv00568 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Banks and Banking |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
(Text-Only) ORDER: Finding good cause, the Court APPROVES the parties' joint Stipulation for Stay Pending Arbitration (ECF No. #8 ). This action is STAYED in all respects pending resolution by settlement or arbitration pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 3. The Court directs the parties to: (1) file a joint update letter within seven days of the arbitrator's decision; and (2) file a joint update letter on the status of the arbitration by September 4, 2024 if an update has not been provided sooner. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 3/13/2024. (MEH)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR STAY PENDING ARBITRATION by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Jointly Signed by Barbara Janson and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Thomson, Richard) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Stipulation and Consent Order Staying Action Pending Arbitration. (Thomson, Richard) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Barbara Janson. Barbara Janson served on 2/29/2024, answer due 3/21/2024. (Cox, Prentiss) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Jerry W. Blackwell recused. Case reassigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 24-cv-568 (ECT/DJF). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings Signed by Judge Jerry W. Blackwell on 2/22/2024.(MMP)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (MMP) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 24-cv-568 (JWB/DJF).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Barbara A. Janson Student Practice Certification Anna Counihan (Cox, Prentiss) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Wells Fargo, N.A. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10857753) filed by Barbara A. Janson. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index, #2 Exhibit(s) 1, #3 Exhibit(s) 2, #4 Exhibit(s) 3, #5 Exhibit(s) 4, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Prentiss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Janson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara Janson | |
| Represented By: | Prentiss E Cox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Richard T Thomson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
