Brown v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
| Peter Brown |
| EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group, S.p.A., Essilor International SAS, EssilorLuxottica USA Inc., Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp., Essilor of America Holding Company, Inc., Luxottica of America, Inc., Essilor of America Inc. and EyeMed Vision Care, LLC |
| 0:2024cv00767 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Essilor International SAS, Essilor of America Holding Company, Inc., Essilor of America Inc., EssilorLuxottica S.A., EssilorLuxottica USA Inc., EyeMed Vision Care, LLC, Luxottica Group, S.p.A., Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp., Luxottica of America, Inc.. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (Related Cases, Non-MDL) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 24-cv-767 KMM/JFD.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10884617) filed by Peter Brown. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gustafson, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
