Costa Rica Recovery SA v. Rivard et al
Costa Rica Recovery SA |
Ryan Rivard and Bespoken Management LLC |
0:2024cv00956 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Katherine M Menendez |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bespoken Management LLC, Ryan Rivard. (ABR) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 24-cv-956 (KMM/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Zachary Ezor. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10912936 filed by Costa Rica Recovery SA. (Reif, Michael) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gagan Gupta. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10912912 filed by Costa Rica Recovery SA. (Reif, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bespoken Management LLC, Ryan Rivard (filing fee $ 405, receipt number BMNDC-10912837) filed by Costa Rica Recovery SA. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Reif, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.