Lovely v. Circle K et al
| Nicki Lovely |
| Circle K and Joseph Farrah |
| 0:2024cv01010 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| David T Schultz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-1010 DWF/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Circle K, Joseph Farrah. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McNee, Emily) Modified text on 3/21/2024 (CLK). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County, case number 27-CV-24-2130 (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10922135) filed by Joseph Farrah, Circle K. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit(s) Decl. of Emily A. McNee, #3 Exhibit(s) A Summons and Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service) (McNee, Emily) Modified text on 3/21/2024 (CLK). Modified text on 3/21/2024 (CLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
