Nguyen v. Barham & Maucere LLC et al
Kimloan Thi Nguyen |
Barham & Maucere LLC, Reliant Loan Servicing, LLC, Fay Servicing, LLC and Randall S. Miller & Associates, PLLC |
0:2024cv01023 |
March 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Leo I Brisbois |
Katherine M Menendez |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Barham & Maucere LLC, Fay Servicing, LLC, Randall S. Miller & Associates, PLLC, Reliant Loan Servicing, LLC. (LTT) |
Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil Master 6th list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 24-cv-1023 KMM/LIB.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (LTT) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10924453) filed by Kimloan Thi Nguyen. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Christensen, Carl) |
Filing 1 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - COMPLAINT against Barham & Maucere LLC, FAY SERVICING, LLC, Randall Miller & Associates, PLLC, Reliant Loan Servicing, LLC (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10924386) filed by Kimloan Thi Nguyen. Filer requests summons issued. (Christensen, Carl) Modified text on 3/22/2024 (ABR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.