Moore v. City of Edina et al
| Kyle Robert Moore |
| City of Edina, Jason Behr, Jefferey Martin, Jaren Zech, Travis Nordhus, Mike Bengtson, Ryan Banaszewski, Jane Doe 1, Ryan Schultz, Bill O'Brien, City of Richfield, Robert Fredricks, City of Bloomington and Jane Doe 2 |
| 0:2024cv01109 |
| April 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Jerry W Blackwell |
| Tony N Leung |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Bloomington, City of Richfield, Jane Doe 2, Robert Fredricks. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ryan Banaszewski, Jason Behr, Mike Bengtson, City of Edina, Jane Doe 1, Jefferey Martin, Travis Nordhus, Bill O'Brien, Ryan Schultz, Jaren Zech. (MMG) Modified text on 4/1/2024 (MMG). |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 24-cv-1109 JWB/TNL.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Kyle Robert Moore against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10942706) filed by Kyle Robert Moore. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shaw, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
