Rued et al v. Jayswal et al
Joseph Daryll Rued, Leah Jean Rued, W.O.R. and Scott Daryll Rued |
Christian M. Sande, Roger M. Klaphake, Carrie Lennon, Nelson L. Peralta, Charlene Hatcher, Bobby Shepherd, Renee L. Worke, Richard A. Stebbins, Jaykumar Jayswal, David R. Stras, Nancy Brasel, Anne Gearity, Mike Furnstahl, Jon Schmidt, Ryan Kuffel, Charles Webber, Leanard Steven Grasz, Lesley Karnes, Judy Weigman, Suzanne Arnston, Julie Swanson, Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department, Scott County Health and Human Services, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jamie Pearson and Natalie E. Hudson |
0:2024cv01763 |
May 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
John R Tunheim |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.