Hasse et al v. Massmann Geothermal & Mechanical, LLC
| Timothy Hasse and Hasse Investments, LLC |
| Massmann Geothermal & Mechanical, LLC |
| 0:2024cv01842 |
| May 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| David T Schultz |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Massmann Geothermal & Mechanical, LLC. (ACH) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-1842 KMM/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Michael Friske on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Friske, Eric) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Timothy Hasse. (Friske, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Massmann Geothermal & Mechanical, LLC (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-11059010) filed by Timothy Hasse. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Friske, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
