Yusuf et al v. Blinken et al
Suleqa Mohamed Yusuf and Isxaaq Moalin Hassan |
Antony Blinken, Linnisa Wahid and Conn Schrader |
0:2024cv02770 |
July 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Katherine M Menendez |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Brooker, Gregory) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Answer Deadline to Facilitate Settlement by Antony Blinken, Conn Schrader, Linnisa Wahid. Jointly Signed by Suleqa Mohamed Yusuf and Isxaaq Maolin Hassan. (Brooker, Gregory) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory G Brooker on behalf of Antony Blinken, Conn Schrader, Linnisa Wahid. (Brooker, Gregory) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Conn Schrader, Linnisa Wahid. (CLK) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 24-cv-2770 KMM/TNL.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-11199049) filed by Suleqa Mohamed Yusuf. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hines, Kelsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.