Tamborski v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
| Denise Tamborski |
| Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc. |
| 0:2024cv03498 |
| August 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| David T Schultz |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Andrew Jones. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-11320231 filed by Denise Tamborski. (Raso, Ashleigh) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael Sawicki. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-11320209 filed by Denise Tamborski. (Raso, Ashleigh) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 24-cv-3498 (NEB/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-11319867) filed by Denise Tamborski. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Raso, Ashleigh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
