Stewart v. Bimeda, Inc.
Plaintiff: Benjamin Stewart
Defendant: Bimeda, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2024cv03708
Filed: September 20, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey M Bryan
Referring Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/3/2025. Fact Discovery due by 10/1/2025. Expert Discovery due by 11/3/2025. Motions (non-disp) due 10/15/2025. Motions (disp) due by 1/5/2026. Ready for trial due by 5/4/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 11/1/2024.(TMA)
October 31, 2024 Filing 8 (Text-Only) MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 10/31/2024: Rule 16 Pretrial Conference.No Digital RecordingTelephone ConferenceTime: 11:30-11:45 a.m.Total Time: 15 minutesAPPEARANCES:For Plaintiff(s): Rolf FiebigerFor Defendant(s): Andrew Tanick PROCEEDINGS: Pretrial Scheduling Order to be issued. (TMA)
October 23, 2024 Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Bimeda, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Benjamin Stewart.(Tanick, Andrew)
October 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER/NOTICE OF SCHEDULING: Pretrial Conference set for 10/31/2024 at 11:30 AM in Audio-only Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 10/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA)
September 27, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Bimeda, Inc.. (Tanick, Andrew)
September 20, 2024 Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 24-cv-3708 (JMB/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP)
September 20, 2024 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bimeda, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Tanick, Andrew)
September 20, 2024 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Bimeda, Inc.. (Tanick, Andrew)
September 20, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL to Federal Court from Washington County District Court, case number 82-cv-24-4049 (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-11367415) filed by Bimeda, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tanick, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Bimeda, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Stewart
Represented By: Thomas Dayton Fiebiger
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bimeda, Inc.
Represented By: Tyler Walter Hartney, I
Represented By: Andrew E Tanick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?