TurboCode LLC v. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: TurboCode LLC
Defendant: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2026cv00515
Filed: January 21, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey M Bryan
Referring Judge: Dulce J Foster
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 (Text-Only) ORDER: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and for good cause shown, the Court APPROVES the parties' Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #14 . Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before March 23, 2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 3/3/2026. (LC1)
March 2, 2026 Filing 14 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.. Jointly Signed by TurboCode LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Werner, Todd)
March 2, 2026 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason M Zucchi on behalf of All Defendants. (Zucchi, Jason)
March 2, 2026 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd Stephen Werner on behalf of Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.. (Werner, Todd)
February 19, 2026 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TurboCode LLC re #10 Order to Party File Document/Respond to Court,,, (Attachments: #1 Addendum Letter sent to Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.)(Bennett, David)
February 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint has passed and Defendant has failed to respond or enter an appearance. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall:1. Notify Defendant immediately that it is required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, or file a motion or stipulation for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond, within ten (10) days of service of the notice;2. File the above notice in CM/ECF; and3. File an application for entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order if no answer or other response is filed by Defendant. Once default is entered by the Clerk's Office, Plaintiff shall promptly seek a default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b); or4. File a letter advising the undersigned of any good cause to the contrary.See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 2/13/2026. (LC1)
January 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David R. Bennett for TurboCode LLC. Approved by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 1/28/2026. (CNO)
January 28, 2026 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TurboCode LLC. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. served on 1/22/2026, answer due 2/12/2026. (Morton, Cyrus)
January 22, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David R. Bennett. Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AMNDC-12565033 filed by TurboCode LLC. (Morton, Cyrus)
January 21, 2026 Filing 6 (Text-Only) Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing David R. Bennett as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (ACH)
January 21, 2026 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.. (ACH)
January 21, 2026 Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan per Civil (3rd, 4th - Patent) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 26-cv-515 JMB/DJF.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH)
January 21, 2026 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for TurboCode LLC. (Morton, Cyrus)
January 21, 2026 Filing 2 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Morton, Cyrus)
January 21, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Multi-Tech Systems, Inc (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-12558391) filed by TurboCode LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Morton, Cyrus)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TurboCode LLC v. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TurboCode LLC
Represented By: Cyrus A Morton
Represented By: David R. Bennett
Represented By: David R. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Todd Stephen Werner
Represented By: Jason M Zucchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?