TurboCode LLC v. Digi International Inc.
| TurboCode LLC |
| Digi International Inc. |
| 0:2026cv00519 |
| January 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 REPORT ON DETERMINATION OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing.) (CLK) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by TurboCode LLC (Bennett, David) |
Filing 18
(Text-only) ORDER. This case is before the Court on the Agreed Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement filed by Plaintiff TurboCode LLC (Dkt. 16). The Motion is GRANTED and all pending deadlines in this case are stayed for 30 days. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 3/31/2026. (CRD)
|
| Filing 17 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #16 MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement (Agreed) filed by TurboCode LLC.(Bennett, David) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement (Agreed) filed by TurboCode LLC. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 15
(Text-Only) ORDER. This case is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint #13 . The Motion is GRANTED. Defendant must answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before March 31, 2026. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 3/12/2026. (CRD)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) filed by TurboCode LLC.(Bennett, David) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) filed by TurboCode LLC. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 12
(Text-Only) ORDER. This case is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint #10 . The Motion is GRANTED. Defendant must answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before March 16, 2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 2/6/2026. (CRD)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re extension of time to respond to complaint #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) filed by TurboCode LLC. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 9
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David R. Bennett for TurboCode LLC. Approved by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 1/28/2026. (CNO)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TurboCode LLC. Digi International Inc. served on 1/23/2026, answer due 2/13/2026. (Morton, Cyrus) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David R. Bennett. Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AMNDC-12564998 filed by TurboCode LLC. (Morton, Cyrus) |
| Filing 6 (Text-Only) Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing David R. Bennett as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMG) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Digi International Inc.. (MMG) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th - Patent list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 26-cv-519 ECT/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for TurboCode LLC. (Morton, Cyrus) |
| Filing 2 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Morton, Cyrus) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Digi International Inc. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-12558781) filed by TurboCode LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Morton, Cyrus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TurboCode LLC v. Digi International Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TurboCode LLC | |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Represented By: | Cyrus A Morton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Digi International Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.