Dalton v. Lacoste USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Julie Dalton
Defendant: Lacoste USA, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2026cv01351
Filed: February 11, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Jerry W Blackwell
Referring Judge: Elsa M Bullard
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 (Text-Only) ORDER. Before the Court is Plaintiff's #9 Consent Motion to Extend Time. Upon review and for good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by April 17, 2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elsa M. Bullard on 4/8/2026. (CRD)
April 7, 2026 Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Julie Dalton.(Michenfelder, Patrick)
April 7, 2026 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Julie Dalton. (Michenfelder, Patrick)
March 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (Text-Only) ORDER. This action comes before the Court on Plaintiff's #6 Consent Motion to Extend Time. Upon review and for good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant must file its answer or other responsive pleading on or before April 6, 2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elsa M. Bullard on 3/10/2026. (CRD)
March 6, 2026 Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Julie Dalton.(Michenfelder, Patrick)
March 6, 2026 Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Julie Dalton. (Michenfelder, Patrick)
February 17, 2026 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julie Dalton. Lacoste USA, Inc. served on 2/13/2026, answer due 3/6/2026. (Michenfelder, Patrick)
February 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER NO. 1: Procedural Requirements for Preliminary and Final Approval of Class Action Settlements. Signed by Judge Jerry W. Blackwell on 2/13/2026. (CRD)
February 11, 2026 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Lacoste USA, Inc. (MKB)
February 11, 2026 Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations, ADA Other) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elsa M. Bullard. Please use case number 26-cv-1351 (JWB/EMB).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB)
February 11, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lacoste USA, Inc. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-12670375) filed by Julie Dalton. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Michenfelder, Patrick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dalton v. Lacoste USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Dalton
Represented By: Patrick W Michenfelder
Represented By: Jason D Gustafson
Represented By: Chad Throndset
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lacoste USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?