Stang v. Schwieters Chevrolet of Cold Spring
Defendant: Douglas Stang and Schwieters Chevrolet of Cold Spring
Case Number: 0:2026cv03064
Filed: June 23, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Schwieters Chevrolet of Cold Spring (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-13061439) filed by Douglas Stang. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Jewell, Sarah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stang v. Schwieters Chevrolet of Cold Spring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas Stang
Represented By: Sarah R Jewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schwieters Chevrolet of Cold Spring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?