Nesse et al v. Steel Rock Commercial LLC
| John Nesse, Tom Lutz and Todd Hayes |
| Steel Rock Commercial LLC |
| 0:2026cv03471 |
| July 31, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Steel Rock Commercial LLC. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 26-cv-3471 (MJD/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steel Rock Commercial LLC (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-13157527) filed by John Nesse, Tom Lutz(as Trustees of the Twin City Carpenters and Joiners Apprenticeship and Journeymen Training Trust Fund, and each of their successor(s)), Todd Hayes, Tom Lutz(as Trustees of the Carpenters and Joiners Welfare Fund and the Carpenters and Joiners Defined Contribution Plan, and each of their successor(s)). Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cefalu, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
