Saliny et al v. Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Inc.
| Black Gold Homes LLC and Morgan P. Saliny |
| Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc. |
| 0:2026cv04813 |
| November 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Douglas L. Micko |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 26-cv-4813 DWF/DLM.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (LTT) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Inc.. (Anderson, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State of Minnesota County of Ramsey Second Judicial District, case number 62-CV-26-8237 (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-13424297) filed by Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
