Robinson v. City of Tupelo, Mississippi et al
| Cameron Robinson |
| City of Tupelo, Mississippi, Lee County, Mississippi, Kaitlyn Weeks and Tim Bell |
| 1:2017cv00055 |
| April 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Aberdeen Division Office |
| Lee |
| Sharion Aycock |
| David A. Sanders |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
AGREED ORDER of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 1/10/2019. (dbm)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice by reason of settlement. This CASE is CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 12/19/2018. (kab)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER finding as moot 116 Motion for More Definite Statement and granting 117 Motion to Dismiss Lee County. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 11/26/18. (kab)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 88 Order on Motion for Qualified Immunity, Order on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Order on Motion to Consider Additional Authority. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 5/23/2018. (dbm)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER TERMINATING MOTION. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/6/2018. (adm)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 28 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 9/12/17. (def)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
