United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right of Way Over 0.14 Acre of Land, More of Less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al
| United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority |
| An Easement and Right of Way Over 0.14 Acre of Land, More of Less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, Lydia Randle, Laurie Randle, Lynn Randle, Harry Randle, Daniel James Sharp, Carl Sharp, Lou Marie Randle, A.B. Sharp, Cheryl Tennial, Carrie J. Webster, Marcus Harrell, Charles D. Johnson, James Hill, Travis Hill, Charles Hill and Ann Marie Hill |
| 1:2017cv00151 |
| September 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Aberdeen Division Office |
| Oktibbeha |
| Sharion Aycock |
| David A. Sanders |
| Land Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1358 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 29 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/4/2019. (dbm)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Settle Interest of Charles Sharp and DISBURSING FUNDS. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/25/2018. (psk)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 5 Motion Entry of an Order for Immediate Possession. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/7/2018. (psk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
