Cases 1 - 10 of 96
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15414
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15111
Plaintiff:
Charles Hill
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Charles Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVIS v. HILL
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Taquar Davis
Defendant:
Charles hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hill v. Lumpkin
as 22-40173
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aaron Charles Hill
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Huntington National Bank v. Infinite Education Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank
Defendant:
Infinite Education Services, Inc. and Charles Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63903
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez v. Gibbs et al
as 0:2021cv61984
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vazquez
Defendant:
Theo Gibbs, Lisa Gibbs, Jim Kinsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47444
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Cooper
as 3:2021cv00681
Plaintiff:
Charles Hill
Defendant:
Lisa Cooper doing business as One Call Painting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
