Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Aaron Hill v. Sean Villery-Samuel, et al
as 20-40300
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAUMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT, CINDY PHILLIPS, Detective, JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CHARLES HILL
USA v. David Hill
as 17-10020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CHARLES HILL, AKA Mack Truck
BRUCE DEL TURCO, SCOTT ERATH, PATRICIA WIGGLESWORHT, CHARLES HILL, JAMES BARTALONE and RON ADE et al v. EASTERN TILE AND STONE CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009mc00206
Plaintiff:
BRUCE DEL TURCO, SCOTT ERATH, PATRICIA WIGGLESWORHT, CHARLES HILL, JAMES BARTALONE and RON ADE, BRUCE DEL TURCO, SCOTT ERATH, JAMES BARTALONE AND THOMAS LANE, JOHN J. FLYNN, KENNETH LAMBERT, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O' MALLEY, JOSEPH BRAMLETT, PAUL SONGER, CHARLES VELARDO, EUGENE GEORGE, MATTHEW AQUILINE, GERALD SCARANO, MICHAEL SCHMERBECKM BEN CAPP, GREGO and others
Defendant:
EASTERN TILE AND STONE CO., INC., EASTERN TILE GROUP, INC., EASTERN COMMERCIAL CO., INC. and others
Del Turco et al v. Speedwell Design
as 1:2002cv05369
Counter Defendant:
Matthew Aquiline, Matthew Aquiline, Matthew Aquiline and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aquiline, Patrick Barrett, James Bartalone and others
Counter Claimant:
BFK Enterprise, LLC, Barry Kolsky, Speedwell Design and others
Defendant:
BFK Enterprise, LLC, Barry Kolsky and Speedwell Design
ThirdParty Defendant:
James Bartalone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Edmonds et al v. Seavey et al
as 1:2008cv05646
Plaintiff:
John L. Edmonds, John L. Edmonds, Logan Plaza Associates, LP and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Seavey, Robert W. Seavey, Logan Plaza Associates, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
