Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
Plaintiff: Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant: The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Case Number: 1:2024cv00005
Filed: January 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Referring Judge: Michael P Mills
2 Judge: David A Sanders
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2024 Filing 12 ANSWER to State Court Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by The City of Columbus. (Clark, Howard)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Sharion Aycock recused. Case reassigned to Senior Judge Michael P. Mills for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/9/2024. (lgm)
February 8, 2024 Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Sharion Aycock: Telephonic Conference held on 2/8/2024. (Court Reporter Digital.) (tjw)
February 7, 2024 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Does 1-20, Jury Demand, filed by Dymon Moore, Gassey Williams. (Reddick, DeMoreo)
January 30, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Conference: Telephonic Conference set for 2/8/2024 03:30 PM in Oxford Tele-Conference before District Judge Sharion Aycock. Call in information provided by separate email to counsel of record. (tjw)
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint - State Court (Unopposed) (or Otherwise Respond) The City of Columbus answer due 2/16/2024. No further order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 1/12/24. No document attached. (def)
January 11, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE by Howard David Clark, III on behalf of The City of Columbus of Electronic Filing of State Court Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons Issued, #4 Exhibit Summons Served, #5 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Clark, Howard)
January 11, 2024 CLERK'S NOTICE re #5 Notice (Other): Attorney to refile State Court Record as required by L.U.Civ.R. 5(b) and as described in the red docket text of Docket Entry #1 . (jwr)
January 10, 2024 Filing 5 DISREGARD ENTRY - ATTORNEY DIRECTED TO REFILE NOTICE by Howard David Clark, III on behalf of The City of Columbus of Electronic Filing of State Court Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record) (Clark, Howard) Modified on 1/11/2024 (jwr).
January 10, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint - State Court (Unopposed) (or Otherwise Respond) by The City of Columbus. (Clark, Howard)
January 10, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gregory Todd Butler on behalf of The City of Columbus (Butler, Gregory)
January 10, 2024 Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against John Does 1-20, The City of Columbus, filed by Dymon Moore, Gassey Williams. (jla)
January 10, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The City of Columbus from Lowndes County Circuit Court, case number 2023-0212-CV1K. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSNDC-2340741) Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 5(b) and the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing for the Northern District of Mississippi, the removing defendant must electronically file a copy of the entire state court record within 14 days of the date of removal. The state court record will be filed using the event State Court Record - Removal. Attach the Notice/Certificate of Filing State Court Record as the main document with each state court document attached as a separate PDF. All attachments must be clearly identified. The state court record can not be filed conventionally., filed by The City of Columbus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla)
January 10, 2024 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dymon Moore
Represented By: DeMoreo Reddick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gassey Williams
Represented By: DeMoreo Reddick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Columbus
Represented By: Gregory Todd Butler
Represented By: Howard David Clark, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?